How Coltrane bent time, harmony, and belief into a single, moving signal
Coltrane didn’t just hear music — he saw it. Geometry, motion, gravity. He was deeply aware of Einstein’s work, and according to David Amram, Trane once said he was “trying to do something like that in music.” That line alone says everything. Giant Steps wasn’t just fast — it was relativistic. Time bending. Harmony in orbit.
Writers like Hollander later tried to reverse-engineer what Coltrane was doing, breaking it down into heavy theory essays on “Music & Geometry” and the now-mythic “Tone Circle.” But Coltrane himself rarely explained the maths. He didn’t need to. He wanted the sound to speak. When he did talk, it was philosophical, mystical — pulling equally from science, spirituality, and lived experience. That openness is why musicians still read his Circle in wildly different ways: some hear pure mathematics, others hear the Divine. Clarinetist Arun Ghosh described it as a system that feels Islamic — a sacred geometry translated into sound.
Yusef Lateef understood this deeply. Few people were closer to Coltrane’s thinking, and he believed Trane’s grasp of musical structure sat right on the fault line between scientific discovery and religious experience. For Coltrane, those weren’t opposites — they were the same intuitive process, arising in the mind through abstraction, feeling, and listening hard enough. That’s why Coltrane still matters. He wasn’t just expanding jazz. He was mapping something universal — a signal that keeps transmitting, if you tune in.
Coltrane-Geometry
Comments
Post a Comment